Showing posts with label mormons. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mormons. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 6, 2014

Joseph Smith was a Gold-digging Con Man. James Faust Simply Ripped the Gold from Native Americans' Mouths


How do you fund the construction of a Mormon temple? By having Native Americans yank their gold fillings out of their mouths. Sound familiar?

The Mormon church has two versions of this story. The first can be found in the May 9, 1998 edition of Church News:




[Faust] emphasized the need to sacrifice for temple building and shared how members in Argentina found ways to donate during the construction of the São Paulo Brazil Temple. They gave the gold from their dental work to help pay for the temple. He said that he had purchased some of the gold fillings for more than the market price to share with congregations the nature of the sacrifice made by these members.



The sanitized version minimizes not only Faust's involvement but also lies about the amount of gold fillings Native Americans had ripped from their mouths. It can be found here:




One memorable donation was a gold dental bridge presented by an Argentine man to a pair of missionaries. They declined the gift at first, saying they couldn't take the man's teeth, but he responded, "You can't deny me the blessings I will receive by giving this to the Lord for his temple." Elder James E. Faust, who was serving as the South America area supervisor for the Church, heard the story and paid a generous sum of money for the gold. From that day on, he kept the dental bridge as a reminder of the Saints' countless sacrifices.



And we've come full circle. Here is the building built on a racist foundation derived from a lousy work of fiction written by a gold-digging con man and funded by the extracted gold fillings of the indigent brown heathens Mormons so loathe. Would Smith be proud or envious?


Saturday, January 16, 2010

Thank You for Joining Us Today


Phew! It was a busy night/morning, and I'm so glad you stopped by. Hopefully you learned something and felt incensed, perplexed and empathetic.

I'd like to thank Colleen Christensen Parkinson, flattopSF and Robert for sharing their stories and for hopefully shining a bright ass light on the LDS church's asshattery and the damage it has caused to so many GLBTQIA and straight people, both in and out of the church.

A special welcome and thanks to Measure76 and the folks at reddit, to Pam's House Blend for allowing me to blogwhore like a maniac and for their superb coverage of the Prop 8 federal suit, to Pharyngula (will someone please tell me how to pronounce that word?) for also allowing me to blogwhore, to all my FaceBook friends and Twitter Tweeps and to Recovery from Mormonism -- without RfM, none of this would have been possible.

My heart is full.

Love,
JNOV

PS Please excuse the typos -- I'm sure there are many. That's how I roll.

Of Murder and Suicide



[
Ed. The following was stolen from flattopSF]

One of Matthew Shepard's murderers was a Mormon. Was he influenced by the cult's teachings? Who knows. Let's just say the cult, unlike other religious organizations, did not publicly decry the tragedy. Nope, From them there was only dead airspace. Maybe a bit of static...and this:
Of particular concern is the recent re-release of the pamphlet "To Young Men Only" which admonishes young LDS men to "protect themselves" by physically assaulting gays when confronted with their homosexuality. This was re-released at the same time as the Matthew Shepard murder trials. Very few people in the LDS Church are aware that one of the two young men convicted of Matthew Shepard's beating death was a young Mormon Priesthood holder. As parents of gay children, it is difficult for us to understand why the Church, in the face of the national attention surrounding Matthew Shepard's beating death, would re-release something as inflammatory, insensitive and troubling as this.


The Mormon church member who they are referring to was Russell A. Henderson. After his conviction, the cult decided to excommunicate him. What a gesture: create and use the tool, then discard it!

[
Ed. Back to JNOV ]

The pamphlet they're referring to contains this language, written by Boyd K. Packer:
After patient encouragement he finally blurted out, "I hit my companion."

"Oh, is that all," I said in great relief.

"But I floored him," he said.

After learning a little more, my response was "Well, thanks. Somebody had to do it, and it wouldn't be well for a General Authority to solve the problem that way."

I am not recommending that course to you, but I am not omitting it. You must protect yourself.

There is a falsehood that some are born with an attraction to their own kind, with nothing they can do about it. They are just "that way" and can only yield to those desires. That is a malicious and destructive lie. While it is a convincing idea to some, it is of the devil. No one is locked into that kind of life. From our premortal life we were directed into a physical body. There is no mismatching of bodies and spirits. Boys are to become men—masculine, manly men—ultimately to become husbands and fathers. No one is predestined to a perverted use of these powers.
"To Young Men Only," General Conference Priesthood Session, October 2, 1976.



Henry Stuart Matis (1967-2000) killed himself at the Los Altos, CA LDS chapel in response to the Mormon church's involvement in Prop 22.

Affirmation has created a memorial to GLBTQ Mormons who have committed suicide. Their memorial was created in response to "four gay Mormons kill[ing] themselves within four weeks" in March 2000 "while leaders of the LDS Church were engaged in a costly anti-gay crusade in California...." They have compiled a list of church members who should never be forgotten.

This is what it all boils down to: Real people are simply trying to live their lives the best way they can. Being gay, lesbian, transgender, bisexual, queer, intersex or asexual is not a crime, and it's certainly not a crime against nature. It is nature in all its beauty and splendor and diversity.

It's time to stop worrying about who's putting what where, because it's nobody's damned business. And it's time religions STOP PREACHING HATE. So many religions foment violence against innocents who are just. trying. to. be. These religions also shame adherents into believing that they are other. That they are less than. That they are not worthy. That they are damned. That they must change the fiber of their beings to reach exaltation. Well, you know what? That's some bullshit right there. As soon as I can stop being brown (oh, wait), my GLBTQI brothers and sisters will start being straight.

No one chooses to be straight. No one chooses to be GLBTQI. It's just
how we are. It's part of who we are, but it's not what defines us, no matter how hard the bastards try to box us in.

Human beings are lovely, complex and beautiful in their diversity and in their individuality. We are whom we are, and we love whom we love, and at the end of the day, we should be pleased that some of us are able to find meaningful and lasting love. That is the meaning of life.

To the Mormon Church, We Are All Gay

A person's sexuality is one of the quirkiest and unique things about them. You learn that if you change sex partners or if you catch someone telling the truth about what he or she likes and does sexually. Our sexuality is also, in important respects, a fundamental, deep and persistent part of our personal identity. So, it is with alarm and anger I have witnessed the Mormon Church over the years insist that people choose whether or not they are gay, and proceed to shame, cajole, or coerce them to adopt the church’s teachings and norms regarding sex and sexual identity, too often to the great harm of those people and their families.

The Mormon Church has insisted—although this has changed somewhat for the better recently—that gays choose their sexual orientation. To “help” their gay members make this “choice,” some of these men were encouraged to marry—essentially, to pass as straight. Such encouragement often resulted in betrayed wives, ashamed, guilty husbands, and heartbroken families. Other gays, desperate to change their sexual orientation, consented to aversion therapy administered at BYU, the church’s university. These men were instructed to look at the gay porn while electrical shocks were applied to their testicles or they were administered chemicals that made them vomit.

Many gay Mormons, feeling lonely, displaced, hopeless, and ashamed, killed themselves. Some still do. Mormonism is still not a gay-friendly culture.

According to some knowledgeable LDS observers, the church leadership has in recent years moved officially to a neutral position on the etiology of homosexuality and the Mormon Church is a more tolerant place for gays. Notwithstanding the official position, Mormon apologists, however, continue to argue homosexuality is a choice, perpetuating the backward, intolerant, and misguided attitudes and behaviors toward gays that have typically characterized the church.

Whether the church leadership’s failure to correct its apologists comes from a desire to avoid alienating loyal members, to avoid the implications to their authority of accepting scientific evidence, or for some other reason, their move toward neutrality should not cause us to forget that the Mormon Church strongly backed Proposition 8 in California, removing the rights of gay couples to marry.

By now you have probably noticed I am not the Mormon Church’s biggest fan. In the interests of disclosure and transparency, I’ll tell you why, and why, in my opinion, to the Mormon Church, we are all gay, even if we are straight. I was a Mormon convert at age 19. I attended BYU, I worked as a teacher at the Missionary Training Center in Provo, UT, I married in the Salt Lake Temple, and I was a Mormon for 13 years. The early years of my membership were generally good for me. The church provided me with community and direction when I needed it most, and I was—and still am—grateful for that. However, as time passed, I discovered many things about Mormonism which disturbed me, among them that the Mormon Church is very intrusive, particularly about sex.

The Mormon leadership does not limit itself to regulating gays; it attempts to micromanage the sex lives of its straight members as well. Both youth and adults undergo periodic “worthiness interviews” by the male leader of their local congregation (bishop) to ensure they are living up to the standards of the church. Some of the questions inquire as to the member’s “moral cleanliness.” The bishop may ask in a general way, “Are you morally clean?” or, too often, he may ask very detailed questions. It depends on the bishop. The interviewee may be a boy or girl as young as 12, a teen, a married father or mother of six, or a grandmother or grandfather.

Interviews are done one-one-one behind closed doors, even with boys and girls. More than a few former Mormons report feeling violated by the process and identify it as a cause of sexual problems later in their lives. (Some former Mormons, including myself, believe this breaking down of boundaries makes young people more vulnerable to sexual abuse and to experiencing difficulty generally resisting intrusive demands.) Almost none of the bishops have any training in counseling and or sexology and too often advice or counsel coming out of the interview is uninformed not outright harmful.

The Mormon Church prohibits masturbation and any sex outside of marriage. Young men are given stern warnings against masturbation and were once told it leads to homosexuality. Sex outside of marriage is strongly condemned and extramarital sex is characterized as a “sin next to murder” in seriousness. If you are unlucky enough to never marry you are expected to remain celibate your entire life. Gays, of course, are also relegated to a lifetime of celibacy because they are prohibited from marrying.

Not even sex between married couples escapes church scrutiny. Couples married in a Mormon temple are told to “refrain from every unholy and impure practice.” While the ceremony doesn’t specify what those unholy and impure practices might be, in January 1982 the church president at the time issued a letter stating, "The First Presidency has interpreted oral sex as constituting an unnatural, impure, or unholy practice. If a person is engaged in a practice which troubles him enough to ask about it, he should discontinue it." Eventually, the letter was withdrawn, apparently due to complaints by local leaders that the instruction was too explicit and intrusive.

However, the prohibition against “unholy and impure practices” remains, with oral sex implicitly continuing to be one of them. A recent Mormon Church president, Gordon B. Hinckley said, "Married persons should understand that if in their marital relations they are guilty of unnatural, impure, or unholy practices, they should not enter the temple unless and until they repent and discontinue any such practices. Husbands and wives who are aware of these requirements can determine by themselves their standing before the Lord."

I myself was unfortunate enough to run afoul of this Mormon purity rule when I was a newly married husband. As a convert, I wasn’t raised Mormon and was unaware of the prohibition and inhibitions of Mormon sex. (Not that it would have helped much had I been raised Mormon, as there seems to be very little frank talk about sex in Mormonism, anyway.) Naturally, I was excited about sex with my wife. I hadn’t had sex before becoming a Mormon. I admit this was due to my being quite shy and anxious rather than my great moral rectitude; in fact, I felt relieved Mormonism provided me with a comforting rationale for my fear of sex. Still, I was looking forward to trying some things out and one of those things was oral sex.

It was after this experimentation the condemning letter from Salt Lake City was issued. My wife and I, duly embarrassed and ashamed, made an appointment with our bishop and confessed our sinfulness. The bishop, an elderly and kind man, to his credit seemed as uncomfortable and embarrassed to have to deal with this issue as we were. Rather than lecture or condemn us, he gave us a light penance and told us to try not to do it again. In spite of the bishop’s kindness, the effect of the experience on me was to curtail my joy of sex, raise my anxiety, and to create a wedge between my wife and me on the issue of whether or not anything I wanted to do beyond missionary-vanilla was “church approved.” For several years I had a recurring nightmare of being watched by church leaders while I had sex and being chided for it. The Mormon marital bed gets crowded when you start including God, his prophets, and the bishop!

It wasn’t until some time after I left Mormonism I started to become relaxed about sex and started to figure out what I like and don’t. My sexual ethics these days are straightforward and not overly-complicated (although I think some people would characterize my standards as “low”): Sex is consensual for all parties and none of the activities result in medical or psychiatric intervention.

So, to my gay friends and to the gay community, if it is any comfort, you are not alone. Some of us straight people, particularly many of us former Mormons, have also experienced, at least in part, sexual scrutiny and oppression, and while we may not experience it as constantly and intensely as you do, we “get it.” As for the Mormon Church, it is a profound failure of empathy and humanity that the sexual outcasts of the 19th century cannot see gays as fellow human beings who deserve tolerance and full civil rights.

In Her Own Words (Part 5 of 5)


A lot has happened in the past 14 years (since he left), the past 25 (since we married) and the past 27 since I found out he is gay. About six years ago, my good friend's daughter was getting married. She told me every time something would go wrong with the wedding plans that her daughter would say, "The church is still true, so what does it matter?" I couldn't get that thought out of my mind. I finally sat down and wrote in my journal that IT MATTERED. It mattered to me. I had based all my life decisions on Mormonism and it had led me here.

For a time when my husband first left, I hated him and I hated all gays. I felt that they had done this to me and that he should have stayed -- that I would let God figure it out. As I kept my distance from the LDS church, the "programming" died. Little by little, the fog lifted until one day about five years ago, one of those non-Mormon guys from my past had suddenly appeared back in my life.

I had tried many times to go back to the LDS church for a few weeks at a time, but I would always become confused and realize that when I had done everything humanly possible to live a good life, this is what had happened. For a week, I emailed my boyfriend from my past trying to explain to him why I no longer believed. He couldn't believe it, as he had known how devout I was 28 years before when I had dated him. I finally told him some of the things the leaders had done to me, and he then believed me.

That week, whatever last beliefs I held onto fell apart. I knew I no longer believed in any fashion -- that they had been wrong. I didn't know any history. I didn't know all the "facts" that Mormonism is untrue. The only thing I knew, as my therapist says, is that I had tested Mormonism to its very limits and it had failed me.

Over the years, my ex and I have made peace and became best friends. I let go of believing that he was somehow flawed and that someday God would give me my answers. I don't know how I came to that point. I credit a lot of it to the fact that I love him. I was willing to see his pain. I saw his struggles. I KNOW that if there is anyone out there who wanted to have the "dream" Mormonism promises, it was my ex. He will still defend Mormonism, but I see how much damage it did to him.

He has lived a double life since a young age and I see the damage. I can't really explain what brought me [to Wildflowers] and it just occurred to me, LOVE. Love brought me here. Loving someone enough to let them go. My relationship with my ex is more than enough, more than anyone could ever have told me it would be. I love him unselfishly. I just want him to be happy -- as a gay man.

Me, I have the "love of my life" back: the non-Mormon I let go at age 20. Our kids love their dad and have a great relationship with him. We always do things together.

I still love my ex-husband so. All I ever wanted for him is that he is happy, and now he is. I will NEVER be able to embrace a religion that would tell me that he isn't okay just as he is, that he isn't worthy and has no value because he is gay.

What I do know is that gays only want what straights have. Being gay is not just about having sex like the LDS church would like us to believe. It is the whole relationship: sexual, physical, mental, emotional, psychological. If I ask my husband to change from being gay, he ceases to exist because being gay is an essential part of who he is.

It was some months later that my therapist told me about Recovery from Mormonism. Until then, I had no clue about a lot of the "issues" in Mormonism. I had found just from life experience, from loving a gay man and where that led me, my experiences, the hell we went through to find the peace we have now. Now we have the relationship we always should have had, as friends.

In Her Own Words (Part 4 of 5)


We went to more therapy. The therapist told us to make pros and cons lists of why we should get a divorce. I made a huge list, but my reasons for getting a divorce had nothing to do with him being gay. He didn't even make a list; he told the therapist that he couldn't BE DIVORCED and he couldn't imagine his life without me. Just as I'd get stable, feeling like things wouldn't change, he'd tell me he was leaving (usually on holidays or birthdays). I'd get prepared for him to leave, and he'd say, "I'm not leaving."

One Christmas, things were uneasy. On January 3rd, I walked in my bedroom, and I knew something was wrong. I walked over to his side of the closet, opened the door, and everything was gone. He had left me a taped message by my computer. He came back the next day, came home the following Monday and told me he wanted a divorce. I kicked him out.

He lived with some friends for a few months, but we decided to have the basement finished so he could move back and we could raise our kids together, but he had already met someone new. My husband moved back in, and this "friend" of his moved to California. In October, my husband said he couldn't be away from this guy, so I said "Go—go to California and see if you are happy."

He went. He cried the whole time he was gone.

I had gone inactive before my husband left when the bishop of our ward had told me my husband would be one of the next bishops. I knew he was cheating although he was executive secretary, but I refused to go to LDS church leaders again. It was very damaging before we were married to go to the church leaders, especially when they not only DID NOT HAVE ANY ANSWERS, but they had the wrong answers. It was very damaging to me to have them as voyeurs in my life and part of the reason I married my husband was to get them out of our lives so we could figure this out.

In Her Own Words (Part 2 of 5)


I fell into a suicidal depression over this situation. I talked to the bishop over and over again. I did typing for the bishop and we were already good friends beforehand, and my boyfriend was the financial clerk, so I spent a lot of time sorting through things with the bishop. I didn't feel like I could tell anyone else. I felt completely and totally alone.

It was a huge burden. I was suicidal for a year thinking about how God could put something like this on the Earth and not have a solution for it. How could this person be damned if there were no answers? I saw God as an authority figure sitting at His judgment bench with his gavel. But as time went by, my feelings changed. My belief system completely changed. I had to deal with all the things that had happened in his past and learn to forgive him for it. I had to either let him go or stick it out. He asked me over and over to wait for him to work through his problems and that he'd always dreamed I'd come into his life to share his burden.

The bishop and other church leaders were supportive of this relationship. For one thing, I was told that if he didn't change, he would be damned. I was also told that not even 1 in 10 "make it." So, basically, he was damned. At that time, the LDS church considered even claiming gay attraction was a sin.

The bishop felt that we could see if he could be attracted to a female. I got the idea that the attitude was (in 1983) that if a gay could just have sex with a woman, he'd never go back -- that they had just had sex with the wrong gender first (my ex had had sex with men since a young age, many mormon gays have not had sex with anyone in their 20s).

So the bishop asked me to experiment with him: just give him "free rein," and he would work with my boyfriend and me. He assigned my boyfriend to take me out and then French kiss me, but not to tell me, that it should appear spontaneous. My boyfriend knew I had never French kissed anyone before because I was afraid I'd have to repent to my bishop. I lived in absolute fear of bishop interviews all my life. Suffice it to say, my boyfriend had the sense to tell me the bishop's plan. Well, I wanted to save him, so I went along.

After that, the bishop gave us more "assignments," and I was very uneasy about it, but I was also suicidally depressed. Nobody knew my boyfriend was gay but the leaders, my boyfriend and me, and I had no one to talk to. I can still see the bishop shaking his head and saying, "But we have to do it this way," when I would voice my concerns about "chastity." I was never comfortable with doing much, so I didn't. At one point, the bishop even told us we could do anything up to intercourse and he would make sure we were able to go through the temple.

I dated more the year after my boyfriend told me he was gay than in my entire life (probably because I was so distracted that I really didn't care), when lo and behold, I met someone new. This person scared my gay boyfriend and, after I moved to get away from the situation, he asked me OVER THE PHONE while I was at work to marry him.

I spent the next day in bed. A very good friend--who was another bishop that I worked with--gave me a blessing. He promised me that my husband would never leave me. He said to me, "How would you feel if God gave you this and you turned your back on it." I know he said this only because he truly believed it and still does. I was already STUCK.

The bishop of our ward told me that it would be okay -- that if I had any doubts in my mind, to put them aside. The LDS Social Services therapist told me that it would be okay if we got married, to just not worry about it. I just realized this past summer that once I was in the situation -- there was no other choice -- I had to go forward. I had to take the chance. I had to give this person more in his life than I saw the gay world as offering him. I said yes. When I finally said yes, I had joy that I had never felt before. I had my doubts -- many, many, many, many doubts as the three months passed to our wedding day, but the day I went to the temple for the first time, those doubts flew out the window. My suicidal depression went away while in the temple. The day I married him was one of the happiest days of my life. Everyone told me that I couldn't have this—and here it was MINE.

In Her Own Words: Colleen Christensen Parkinson's Story (Part 1 of 5)



Colleen Christensen Parkinson is an ex-Mormon who grew up in Brigham City, Utah and now resides in Hyrum, Utah. This is her story:

I think the thing that surprised me the most by the story I read on Wildflowers (ex-wives of gay Mormons) is that there are still women marrying gays in the Mormon church -- let alone in the world -- when things are so much more open now. When my story started, I thought all gays lived in San Francisco and that they were a limited bunch. I had even had a heated debate with a Catholic friend of mine about gays a few years before I started dating my future husband.

I had been in a singles ward for several years. I had been presented several opportunities to marry to men outside the church, but I wanted the "for time and all eternity" marriage. I wanted to be assured that I would never be alone, that I would never lose the man I loved, and so I held out for that "dream."

I was giving up on that singles ward when in early June of 1982 I had a dream about someone that I would meet in my ward. A month later, I had another dream that that person who would be my husband would be at church the next day. The dream was so vivid that I waited in the foyer watching each person come in. I finally went into opening exercises late and sat down by a friend on the back row. Within minutes, another friend of mine came in with someone new and they sat down right next to me -- with the new person sitting RIGHT next to me. It was crowded on the bench, so it was rather obvious that he was the one. I was never one to pursue guys or flirt, but this was the one I had dreamed about and so I made an effort to get to know him, and it wasn't long before we were friends and then began dating.

After seven months of dating, I was confused about where things were going, so I confronted this guy as to how serious he was about our relationship, and it was then that he told me that he was gay. I remember staring out the window of his apartment and thinking, "I'm not my mother's little girl anymore."

When in Doubt, Kick Them Out!


Some GLBTQ Mormons wish to stay in the church, and Affirmation is a group of activist GLBTQ Mormons (some still active in the church, some who have left due to excommunication or of their own volition) who believe:
in the worth of every soul regardless of their sexual or gender orientation. We rejoice in life. We reject the tyranny that would have us believe that who we are—gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender—is evil or wrong. We affirm that we are all children of loving Heavenly Parents; that our sexual orientation and identity are not an accident, but rather a special gift from God. Our lives and our relationships can be compatible with the Gospel and are a special part of God’s creation.
Despite their efforts, most GLBTQ Mormons are excommunicated if they come out to church authorities and continue their "gay ways." Gamofites, a group of gay Mormon fathers, faced excommunication, and their accounts of church harassment and excommunication were the subject of a Nightline Special, "Gay Mormons Face Excommunication."

These men recount their attempts to abstain from all but church-sanctioned hetero sex, they married and had children, some underwent "reparative therapy torture," to try and fix something that doesn't need fixing, but what they really want and need is to be accepted as the people they are. They're hoping and praying the church will change, but the likelihood of that happening is slim to none in a church that doesn't even recognize the existence of bisexual or transgender members. Gotta be a temple-worthy, tithe-paying breeder to get into the Celestial Kingdom. Sorry!

What Do Head Honcho Mormons Say about GLBTQIA Members?


Spencer W. Kimball (dead LDS Prophet, Seer and Revelator) promised that if you masturbate, you'll evolve into a homosexual:
Prophets anciently and today condemn masturbation. It induces feelings of guilt and shame. It is detrimental to spirituality. It indicates slavery to the flesh, not that mastery of it and the growth toward godhood which is the object of our mortal life. Our modern prophet has indicated that no young man should be called on a mission who is not free from this practice. What is more, it too often leads to grievous sin, even to that sin against nature, homosexuality. For, done in private, it evolves often into mutual masturbation-practiced with another person of the same sex and thence into total homosexuality....
The Miracle of Forgiveness, 1969, pp. 77-79, 81-82.


More Spencer (kick out the gays):
Let it therefore be clearly stated that the seriousness of the sin of homosexuality is equal to or greater than that of fornication or adultery; and that the Lord’s Church will as readily take action to disfellowship or excommunicate the unrepentant practicing homosexual as it will the unrepentant fornicator or adulterer
The Miracle of Forgiveness, 1969, pp. 81–82; italics in original.


And yet more Spencer -- here he recommends the death penalty for homosexuality:
I do not find in the Bible the modern terms "petting" nor "homosexuality," yet I found numerous scriptures which forbade such acts under by whatever names they might be called. I could not find the term "homosexuality," but I did find numerous places where the Lord condemned such a practice with such vigor that even the death penalty was assessed.
"Love Versus Lust," BYU Devotional Speech, January 5, 1965


Guess who! Spencer warns that homosexuals are looking for converts:
Homosexuality is an ugly sin, but because of its prevalence, the need to warn the uninitiated, and the desire to help those who may already be involved with it, it must be brought into the open.

Can't get enough Spencer? Here civilization is going down the shitter because of homosexuality:
This heinous homosexual sin is of the ages. Many cities and civilizations have gone out of existence because of it.7


Boyd Packer (President of those 12 Quorum guys) on gay bashing -- it's encouraged because those gays are asking for it:
After patient encouragement he finally blurted out, "I hit my companion."

"Oh, is that all," I said in great relief.

"But I floored him," he said.

After learning a little more, my response was "Well, thanks. Somebody had to do it, and it wouldn't be well for a General Authority to solve the problem that way."

I am not recommending that course to you, but I am not omitting it. You must protect yourself.

There is a falsehood that some are born with an attraction to their own kind, with nothing they can do about it. They are just "that way" and can only yield to those desires. That is a malicious and destructive lie. While it is a convincing idea to some, it is of the devil. No one is locked into that kind of life. From our premortal life we were directed into a physical body. There is no mismatching of bodies and spirits. Boys are to become men—masculine, manly men—ultimately to become husbands and fathers. No one is predestined to a perverted use of these powers.
"To Young Men Only," General Conference Priesthood Session, October 2, 1976.



Elder Richard G. Scott (one of those 12 Quorum guys) -- extramarital sex will turn you into a homosexual:
However, those intimate acts are forbidden by the Lord outside the enduring commitment of marriage because they undermine His purposes. 7 Within the sacred covenant of marriage, such relationships are according to His plan. When experienced any other way, they are against His will. They cause serious emotional and spiritual harm. Even though participants do not realize that is happening now, they will later.

Sexual immorality creates a barrier to the influence of the Holy Spirit with all its uplifting, enlightening, and empowering capabilities. It causes powerful physical and emotional stimulation. In time that creates an unquenchable appetite that drives the offender to ever more serious sin. It engenders selfishness and can produce aggressive acts such as brutality, abortion, sexual abuse, and violent crime. Such stimulation can lead to acts of homosexuality, and they are evil and absolutely wrong. 8


Kaye T. Hanson
(I have no idea who she is) defines "sex perversion":
The Lord specifically forbids certain behaviors, including all sexual relations before marriage, petting, sex perversion (such as homosexuality, rape, and incest), masturbation, or preoccupation with sex in thought, speech, or action”
(FSOY, 14–15)

Asshats.

Welcome to GLBTQIA Day: Celebrating Nearly 180 Years of Mormon Homophobia, Bigotry and Violence!

But first, your morning dose of Boop (I scratched him, then he scratched me, but I'm the only one bleeding):



Thanks for joining us for our second weekly installment detailing 180 years of Mormon asshattery and dumbfuckery! Last week on "Lamanite" Day, we established that Mormonism is fundamentally based on racism. (We only addressed the racist tenets held about Native Americans and Pacific Islanders -- we will be addressing racism directed at Africans and people of African descent in the near future.)

In addition to being fundamentally based on racism, Mormonism is also fundamentally based on sex. Now, there's nothing new about a religion telling you whom you may fuck and in what position said fucking must occur, and many religions tell you that God doesn't like you very much if you're not a 0 on the Kinsey scale. But Mormonism takes sex to a whole 'nuther level that could possibly only be matched by those wacky Raëlians. Joseph Smith, Jr. liked sex. A lot. I mean, he liked sex so much that he was married to at least 30 women at the same time, and some of them were already married to other living dudes.

Now I'm not going to fault Old Horny Joe for enjoying sexual encounters with multiple sex partners -- that's the one thing we have in common. What I am going to call him out on is basing exaltation on being a temple-married breeder, and on Misogyny Day, we'll talk about how Smith married underage girls -- two of them 14 years old.

But today we'll be discussing a wide range of topics w/r/t Mormonism and GLBTQIA (although Mormonism really only recognizes gays and lesbians) members and the GLBTQIA community outside of Mormonism -- I guess Mormons have to take their bullshit ideas of love and marriage on the road and impose them on the rest of the world.

As a straight nevermo, I don't have any personal experience to draw from, but I get by with a lot of help from my friends. Today I will be joined by three guest bloggers, all ex-Mormons with first-hand experience of Mormon ashattery and dumbfuckery when it comes to sexual preference, gender expression and gender identity.

We'll be publishing a post at least every half hour; personal story posts will be published every fifteen minutes.

Expect:

1. Some background on LDS doctrine w/r/t the three levels of heaven and why GLBTQ folks who do not consummate hetero temple marriages will not get into the highest level of heaven;

2. Notable quotes about GLBTQ folks from church leaders;

3. A discussion about the excommunication of GLBTQ members;

4. A comparison of the process of acceptance of sexual identity and the process of leaving Mormonism written by an exMormon marriage and family therapist;

5. The despicable history of Evergreen, past and present, including BYU aversion torture;

6. An overview of Mormons and Prop 8 meddling;

7. Stories of church-induced suicide and violence;

8. To learn about how the church pressures members to marry someone of the opposite sex even if a member is out to the local church authorities; and

9. Personal stories posted by GLBTQ exmormons

We've got a lot of ground to cover, and our posts won't be exhaustive, but we will provide you with the ability to continue your study of this fucked up bullshit if you so choose. Connell O'Donovan has crafted a well-researched and comprehensive book, "The Abominable and Detestable Crime Against Nature": A Revised History of Homosexuality & Mormonism, 1840-1980
, revised in 2004. We can't come close to providing you with the depth and breadth of information and analysis Connell O'Donovan provides, and I encourage you to read further at his site.

So, thank you for joining us, we hope you learn something useful, and please feel free to comment, correct, challenge and vent. The anonymous commenting option is open, and comments are not moderated.